Best, Stephen LaPorte (WMF) ( talk) 21:39, 25 February 2014 (UTC) Ok. The community advocacy team and a few others are helping us reach out beyond the English language community, and I am following the non-English discussions to the best of my ability (for example, the WikiProjekt Umgang mit bezahltem Schreiben discussion on DEWP and Wikipedia:Bybrunnen discussion on SVWP). We hoped that a single, multi-language page would encourage more interaction between languages, but this discussion has grown unusually large. The biggest difficulty for separate pages is keeping the conversations connected. How about a separate talk page per language for the big language communities, which can then be transcluded onto one page for tracking? – SJ talk 09:11, 24 February 2014 (UTC) Yes, we can create separate talk pages per language. Huge talk pages don't currently work for multilingual discussion. Paracel63 ( talk) 01:39, 28 February 2014 (UTC) Separate talk pages by language I sincerely hope you can get some sort of useful result out of this. And most of the " speakers" seem to be shouting about this issue from different perspectives. But this discussion page really looks like Hyde Park with a thousand and one soapboxes, each one carrying a politician shouting. Me and at least one more svwp editor did cast a vote here and posted some comments. Thanks a lot! Stephen LaPorte (WMF) ( talk) 01:27, 27 February 2014 (UTC) Thanks for understanding. Best of wishes.- Paracel63 ( talk) 00:08, 27 February 2014 (UTC) It is indeed a long discussion, so I completely understand! I appreciate that you are coordinating the conversation with SVWP and keeping me informed. Just one note: svwp is not the same as enwp the 50 times less amount of editors mean we are in a quite different position. In due time you will get the results of our svwp voting, with clarified positions and arguments. It would mean a full-time occupation for me trying to be involved in this, which I just cannot afford, neither have the time to. I took a quick (that was my intention) look at the discussion, tried to wade through the differing opinions and fell asleep (true!) before I got to the end of the page. Stephen LaPorte (WMF) ( talk) 21:57, 25 February 2014 (UTC) Thanks but no thanks as for now. Please let me know if there are any points I can help you clarify! You are also welcome to bring comments to the discussion page on Meta (in Swedish, English, or any other language). All for now.- Paracel63 ( talk) 02:52, 22 February 2014 (UTC) Hello Paracel63, thanks for pointing me to the discussion on SV Wikipedia. Our preliminary discussion at Bybrunnen has, however, resulted in a large majority against the proposal. We will within a week or two give you the results of our voting. As you can see we are preparing a local voting on the issue. Best, Stephen LaPorte (WMF) ( talk) 00:32, 4 December 2013 (UTC) Legalities I see that there is already an external link to Chilling Effects - we also submit our takedown notices there, too. Lotje ( talk) 10:49, 28 November 2013 (UTC) Hello Lotje: Yes, you may add a link. Hi, Slaporte (WMF), I was wondering if it is okay to add this link to the external links section on the Digital Millennium Copyright Act page. Stephen LaPorte (WMF) ( talk) 00:35, 4 December 2013 (UTC) Necessary and Proportionate Ī statement on surveillance we should consider signing. Dominic ( talk) 18:32, 3 July 2013 (UTC) Hello Dominic: thanks for reporting this. And they have themselves listed in "Services" for. This is nothing urgent, but I just thought I would let you know that a marketing company has set up a fake " " company page on LinkedIn, if I am understanding things correctly.
#Wmf perfect plus instruction manual english update
Stephen LaPorte (WMF) ( talk) 14:09, (UTC) Ping! Ĭan you review this or have it reviewed, please?- Elvey ( talk) 22:44, (UTC) PRISM Īny update on an official reaction by WMF? We've been waiting since the 21st of June. See the bottom of Talk:Wikimedia_Foundation_board_manual#Votes_vs._resolutions.2C_quorum_and_required_majority - what do you think? – SJ talk 21:28, (UTC) Thanks! I will review and reply on that page. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You may find it useful to read our policy page. Welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects.